<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sylvan&#039;s Thoughts &#187; buying property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swartzcre.com/observations/tag/buying-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swartzcre.com/observations</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Commercial Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Negative Leverage Negative?</title>
		<link>http://www.swartzcre.com/observations/2008/03/is-negative-leverage-negative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.swartzcre.com/observations/2008/03/is-negative-leverage-negative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvan Swartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[buying parameters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash flow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swartzcre.com/observations/2008/03/28/is-negative-leverage-negative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earning interest at the rate of 3% on your savings and carrying credit card debt at 19% seems to indicate a financial disconnect.  If this were to happen for a month or 2 it may have some rationale, but certainly not long term.
The same reasoning can be applied to buying a property using what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earning interest at the rate of 3% on your savings and carrying credit card debt at 19% seems to indicate a financial disconnect.  If this were to happen for a month or 2 it may have some rationale, but certainly not long term.</p>
<p>The same reasoning can be applied to buying a property using what is known as negative leverage.  That is, buying a property at a 5 cap rate and financing it at 7% interest.  It&#8217;s going to be real tough to make a return on investment until the net operating income grows substantially.</p>
<p>Buyers are suddenly reacquainting themselves with the concept of cash flow.  It&#8217;s been a few years since that has dawned on them.  Frankly, I&#8217;m not sure why that concept seemed to vaporize around 2002 or 2003 but it did.</p>
<p>I know, I know property values shot up faster than a rocket and one only had to buy and sell a property in the space of a few months to realize their gain.  But still, why did we collectively lose our basic principles when dealing with hard assets such as real estate.</p>
<p>Why did losing money become fashionable?  Why did it take the tanking of the entire mortgage market and eventually the credit market to wake us up?</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t it be nice when Sellers all wake up too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.swartzcre.com/observations/2008/03/is-negative-leverage-negative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
